Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
نویسندگان
چکیده
Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved over that last 10 years consequent to the results of several important clinical trials. Although the primary concern for patients is their symptoms, we as urologists are further concerned about the progression of disease and complications of the disease. Two classes of medications, alpha blockers and 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARI), have shown excellent results for treatment of symptoms and improvement of peak urine flow. Either medication alone has benefit, however, the combination of these medications seems to have more benefit than either alone as best demonstrated by 2 major clinical trials. Though combination therapy is overall superior, evidence has shown that dutasteride as monotherapy has continually improving effects on BPH symtoms and progression of disease beyond 2 years of treatment. Given the cost and side effects of a dual treatment regimen coupled with evidence for continued symptom relief when alpha blockers are removed from combination with dutasteride, there is good evidence for use of dutasteride as long-term monotherapy. Although the evidence thus far favours dutasteride over finasteride in symptom relief and peak urine flow in BPH patients, the difference in selection criteria between finasteride and dutasteride trials creates difficulty in deciding superiority of one over the other. The evidence for dutasteride as monotherapy for BPH is reviewed herein with some comparisons to finasteride.
منابع مشابه
The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine.
Though the need for reviews of data in clinical medicine is not new, the pressures to use such reviews are becoming increasingly apparent. Currently, there about 23,000 biomedical journals worldwide publishing some 2,000,000 peer reviewed papers a year. One study has estimated that a general physician needs to read 19 original articles a day, for 365 days a year, to keep abreast of their field ...
متن کاملA Novel Experience in Treatment of Liver Hydatidosis in Pediatrics: A Clinical Trial Study
Background Hydatidosis is a conventional health public problem in most parts of the world. Safe treatment of patients with hydatidosis has been a topic of debate for a long time. Surgical treatment always was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Medical treatment is also controversial. In this study, alternative procedure named Percutaneous, Aspiration and hypertonic Saline Instillat...
متن کاملAxillary irradiation in breast cancer; does meticulous contouring make a difference?
Background: Due to the current trends towards replacing axillary dissection with radiotherapy, the need for more precise definition for different nodal stations becomes a must to ensure safe and adequate dose coverage. So, our study aimed to evaluate the coverage of axillary nodal volumes based on Project on Cancer of the Breast (PROCAB) guidelines, for cases previously treated with our standar...
متن کاملThe Role of Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Children with Cancer
Background: Nausea and vomiting are among the most important side-effects associated with chemotherapy in children with cancer, affecting the quality of their lives. Clinical guidelines for selecting antiemetics are effective in reducing acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Materials and Methods: The present quasi-experimental study compared the effectiveness of the Pediatric...
متن کاملCritical reviews of economic analyses in order to make health care decisions for cancer.
The idea of promoting evidence based medicine, understood as practicing according to the best evidence based on exhaustive and systematic reviews of all available data, is very convincing and difficult to contest rationally. This certainly does not mean that the exact type of evidence to take into consideration is indisputable. Thus, Maynard [2] recently accused leading spokesmen for the eviden...
متن کاملManaging radiation therapy side effects with complementary medicine.
Over one-third of Americans use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The prevalence among cancer patients may even be higher. Complementary therapies may reduce possible symptom burdens caused by conventional cancer treatments. Integrating CAM therapies has become more common and more accepted in clinical oncology. However, little research is available on beneficial CAM therapies for r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010